Knowledge base
Resume Checks
Each check isolates one failure mode so users can see what breaks, why it breaks, and how to fix it.
Knowledge base
Each check isolates one failure mode so users can see what breaks, why it breaks, and how to fix it.
checks
ATS readability is a structure problem first. We prioritize parser-risk signals before cosmetic advice.
Open pagechecks
This check isolates hidden text-layer and export problems that frequently survive normal visual edits.
Open pagechecks
This check compares parser behavior across both formats and highlights which export keeps meaning intact.
Open pagechecks
This check identifies when sidebars and split columns reorder key resume evidence for machine parsers.
Open pagechecks
ATS parsers are brittle with grid-like structures that look clean visually but collapse semantically.
Open pagechecks
This check focuses on icon-heavy and decorative patterns that strip parseable context from key fields.
Open pagechecks
Parser noise from decorative headers and footers can duplicate or displace meaningful resume content.
Open pagechecks
This check ensures your top-of-page identity fields are machine-readable and recruiter-safe.
Open pagechecks
Chronology is one of the highest-impact resume signals for both ATS and recruiters.
Open pagechecks
Even strong content can underperform if core sections are buried or split by decorative elements.
Open pagechecks
This check focuses on legibility, spacing consistency, and export reliability rather than font myths.
Open pagechecks
Recruiters and systems often surface raw file names. Clear naming improves trust and handling.
Open pagechecks
This check evaluates density and clarity so users can trim low-signal content first.
Open pagechecks
This check balances terminology coverage with anti-stuffing signals and proof quality.
Open pagechecks
This check highlights skill gaps by impact and separates missing terms from missing proof.
Open pagechecks
This check flags visual payload and compliance concerns linked to profile photos.
Open page